Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-22 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| -- | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a score of 87.1, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G's 77.8 general score. Despite being the best we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy Note9 is a notably older, a little bit thicker and a little heavier cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G. Galaxy Note9 features a much faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A33 5G. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores.
Galaxy Note9 features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A33 5G, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy Note9 also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 and more pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy A33 5G features a bit bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A33 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 captures a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A33 5G, because although it has a camera in the back with much less MP, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better captures and videos in low light situations. Galaxy A33 5G features improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.