Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2017-09-22 |
| -- | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 has an overall score of 85, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A34's global score of 82.9. The Apple iPhone 8 counts with a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has 2 lesser and slower CPU cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The iPhone 8 has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A34, although it has a much lower resolution of 750 x 1334px, a much smaller screen and a quite inferior amount of pixels per inch of screen. Apple iPhone 8 features a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A34, because it has 192 GB more internal storage.
Galaxy A34 counts with a much better battery life than Apple iPhone 8, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 1821mAh. The iPhone 8 counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A34, although it has a way tinier camera sensor which provides a way worse image and video quality and a way lower 12 MP resolution camera, they both have the same camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.