Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2018-09-21 |
| -- | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS Max has a global score of 84.5, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A34's global score of 82.9. The iPhone XS Max has just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has a lower number of cores and they are also slower, and they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The iPhone XS Max features a slightly better display than Galaxy A34, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher count of pixels in each inch in the display and a slightly better 1242 x 2688 resolution. IPhone XS Max features as much storage to store more apps and games as the Samsung Galaxy A34, they have the same internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A34 counts with a much better battery performance than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 57 percent greater battery size. Apple iPhone XS Max has a bit better camera than Galaxy A34, although it has a lot less MP camera and a lot smaller sensor capturing lot lower quality photographs, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.