Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2016-09-29 |
| -- | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A34 is slightly better than LG V20, having an 82.9 score against 77. Galaxy A34 is a a lot lighter and notably thinner cellphone than the LG V20. The LG V20 has a bit better display than Galaxy A34, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The LG V20 features a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A34, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the LG V20 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A34 has a little faster processor than LG V20, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Galaxy A34 also has more cpu cores.
Galaxy A34 counts with a very superior battery life than LG V20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. LG V20's camera is just as good as the camera in Galaxy A34, and although the LG V20 has a back camera with way less mega pixels and a much tinier sensor taking much worse quality videos and photos, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.