Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2017-09-21 |
| -- | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A34 is a bit better than LG V30, with a score of 82.9 against 79.1. The Galaxy A34 body is a lot thinner and way lighter than LG V30. LG V30 features a little bit better screen than Galaxy A34, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a better pixel number per inch of screen.
Galaxy A34 has a little faster processor than LG V30. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 4 GB RAM. LG V30 counts with a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A34, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG V30 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A34 counts with a superior battery lifetime than LG V30, because it has a 52 percent more battery size. The LG V30 counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A34, because although it has a way tinier camera sensor which offers a lot worse image and video quality and a camera in the back with lot less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better photography and video in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.