Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13 | Android 4.4.4 |
| -- | 2014-10-28 |
| -- | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| -- | 6.21 ounces |
| -- | Black and Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A34 is a little bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo, having a global score of 82.9 against 76.4. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A34 has older 13 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. The Galaxy A34 construction is notably thinner and way lighter than Motorola Droid Turbo.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A34, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an additional GPU. Motorola Droid Turbo features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better pixels amount per inch in the display.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a camera that is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A34 one, although the Motorola Droid Turbo has a camera in the back with a much worse resolution and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photos. Galaxy A34 features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal storage.
The Galaxy A34 counts with improved battery duration than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.