Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13 | Android 4.4.4 |
| -- | 2014-10-28 |
| -- | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| -- | 6.21 ounces |
| -- | Black and Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A34 is a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo, getting an 82.9 score against 77.9. The Galaxy A34 body is much lighter and thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A34 has the older 13 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel amount in each inch in the screen and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. Motorola DROID Turbo features as much memory capacity to install applications and games as the Samsung Galaxy A34, both of them have equal internal memory.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Galaxy A34 and the Motorola DROID Turbo count with quite similar cameras, although the Motorola DROID Turbo has a smaller diafragm aperture and a back camera with much less megapixels.
The Galaxy A34 counts with better battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.