Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2018-08-29 |
| -- | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a score of 85.5, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A34's overall score of 82.9. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A34, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2246 pixels and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher pixel density. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A34, although it has a camera in the back with much less mega pixels resolution, a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking pictures or video in low light situations and a lot smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A34, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 256 GB and 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A34 has greater battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.