Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2024-03-11 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 6.12 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, getting a score of 84.9 against 79.4. The iPhone 11 Pro counts with iOS 15.x OS, while Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 OS. IPhone 11 Pro's design has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, but it's lighter. The iPhone 11 Pro counts with a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch, a bit higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution and a way brighter display.
Galaxy A35 5G features a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has more internal memory. IPhone 11 Pro has a really superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G shoots much clearer photos and videos than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same aperture and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a way larger back camera sensor which provides a way better image and video quality and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
The Galaxy A35 5G has a really longer battery duration than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3046mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.