Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.12 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 has an overall score of 85, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's score of 79.4. Although the iPhone 8 is extremely older than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, it's construction is incredibly lighter and a little bit thinner. The iPhone 8 counts with a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has 2 less CPU cores (although they are faster) and lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The Galaxy A35 5G has a little more vivid screen than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has much worse brightness, it also counts with a bit better pixel density, a much larger display and a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a superior camera than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher 50 MP resolution and a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
IPhone 8 has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a way better battery performance than Apple iPhone 8, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.