Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.12 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS Max is a little bit better than the Galaxy A35 5G, having a score of 84.5 against 79.4. Apple iPhone XS Max's body is a bit thinner and just a bit lighter than Galaxy A35 5G, even though it was released 6 years before. Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a much faster CPU than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and less cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
IPhone XS Max has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite brighter display, a bit higher resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels and a little higher pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a superior camera than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a way more MP back-facing camera and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XS Max, because it has 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy A35 5G has a much longer battery duration than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3179mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.