Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2017-08-03 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.25 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A35 5G is just a bit better than Asus ZenFone AR, having a 79.4 score against 77.4. Although the Galaxy A35 5G is somewhat heavier than Asus ZenFone AR, it's a bit thinner and a lot newer. The Asus ZenFone AR counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per inch of display and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
Asus ZenFone AR has a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Asus ZenFone AR also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Asus ZenFone AR features a much faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has less cpu cores , they both have 6 GB of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a superior battery performance than Asus ZenFone AR, because it has a 52% bigger battery capacity. The Galaxy A35 5G takes much clearer photographs and videos than Asus ZenFone AR, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a bigger camera aperture, faster 30 fps video frame rates, a much bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a much better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.