Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is just a bit better than the Galaxy A35 5G, with an 81.6 score against 79.4. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel 2 is incredibly older than the Galaxy A35 5G, it's construction is just a little thinner and notably lighter. Google Pixel 2 counts with a very superior processing unit than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Google Pixel 2 counts with a display that's just as good as Galaxy A35 5G's display, because although the Google Pixel 2 has a bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution and a really smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G shoots better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also has a way bigger sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality and a camera with a lot higher resolution.
Google Pixel 2 and Galaxy A35 5G count with similar memory capacity to install games and applications, both of them have exactly the same internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.