Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G is a bit better than the LG V30, getting a global score of 79.4 against 79.1. Although the Galaxy A35 5G is much newer than the LG V30, it is much heavier and just a little thicker. LG V30 counts with an extremely better processor than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
LG V30 counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880px resolution and more pixels per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G captures much clearer photos and videos than LG V30, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a camera with a lot higher resolution.
LG V30 has a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a really longer battery performance than LG V30, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.