Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-03-11 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is slightly better than the Galaxy A35 5G, with an 83.7 score against 79.4. LG V50 ThinQ's body is somewhat lighter than Galaxy A35 5G, although it's just a little thicker and was released many years before. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version while Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version.
The LG V50 ThinQ features an extremely better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G. They have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better display density and a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution.
LG V50 ThinQ features a very superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A35 5G features better battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy A35 5G features a much better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light captures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels camera in the back and a lot larger camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.