Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| -- | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G is slightly better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, having a global score of 79.4 against 76.4. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy A35 5G has older 14 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Although the Galaxy A35 5G is somewhat heavier than the Motorola Droid Turbo, it's a lot thinner and also extremely newer.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a more vivid display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a better display pixels density. Motorola Droid Turbo features a lot better performance than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processor.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features longer battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 28% more battery capacity. Galaxy A35 5G captures much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a larger diafragm aperture, a back facing camera with a much better 50 megapixels resolution and better 30 fps video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.