Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| -- | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A35 5G is a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, having a global score of 79.4 against 77.9. Galaxy A35 5G's design is a lot newer and a lot thinner, but also heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A35 5G has older 14 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a very superior processor than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a GPU. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel amount per inch in the display and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G captures better photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also has a lot more megapixels back-facing camera, higher 30 fps video frame rates and a bigger aperture. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
Galaxy A35 5G has greater battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.