Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| -- | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is better than the Galaxy A35 5G, with a general score of 91.8 against 79.4. These phones come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has the previous 11 version and Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's construction has the same thickness than Galaxy A35 5G, but it's somewhat lighter.
Galaxy A35 5G counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A71 5G, although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a little bit smaller screen and a bit lower pixels density. The Galaxy A71 5G has a way bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much better performance than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. The Galaxy A71 5G captures slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the same video frame rates and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a lot better 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a bigger sensor shooting better quality videos and photos.
Galaxy A35 5G has just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.