Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| -- | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 has a score of 87.1, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A35 5G's global score of 79.4. The Galaxy Note9 is a notably older and just a little thicker phone than the Galaxy A35 5G, but Samsung was able to build it just a little bit lighter anyway. The Galaxy Note9 has a much more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A35 5G. They have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
The Galaxy Note9 features a little bit better screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels amount in each inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution. The Galaxy A35 5G captures better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has worse video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a much bigger sensor taking way higher quality videos and pictures and a camera with a lot better 50 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy Note9 has a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy Note9 also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy A35 5G features better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.