Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-03-11 | 2018-10-17 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ3 has a score of 79.6, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A35 5G's 79.4 general score. These phones include Android OS, but Xperia XZ3 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14, counting with a lot of extra features. Although Xperia XZ3 is extremely older and somewhat thicker than the Galaxy A35 5G, it's body is still a bit lighter.
The Xperia XZ3 counts with a really superior performance than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Xperia XZ3 has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per display inch, a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a quite more brightness.
Xperia XZ3 has a greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features just a bit better camera than Xperia XZ3, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also has a much more MP camera in the back, a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography in low-light situations and a bigger back camera sensor capturing better quality pictures and videos.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a much better battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ3, because it has a 50% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.