Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.12 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A35 5G is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a global score of 79.4 against 77.8. Both phones we compare here include the same Android 14 OS (operating system), so both of them should provide you very similar operating system features. Even though the Galaxy A35 5G and vivo X Fold 3 Pro were released with only 1 months difference, Galaxy A35 5G's design is thicker but also just a little lighter.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features an incredibly better display than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has a really brighter display, a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480, a larger display and a bit greater pixel count per inch of display. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has 10 GB more RAM.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has 512 GB internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a larger aperture for better low-light images and videos, a way larger sensor and a lot higher video resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.