Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| -- | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.44 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A35 5G is slightly better than the vivo X60 Pro, with a general score of 79.4 against 78.8. Galaxy A35 5G is a much newer phone than the vivo X60 Pro, but it is heavier and a little bit thicker. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy A35 5G has newer 14 version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a little bit better screen than vivo X60 Pro, although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, they both have a same size screen. Vivo X60 Pro features a much faster processing unit than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The vivo X60 Pro captures a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a tinier sensor capturing lower quality videos and pictures, a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a worse 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, they both have the same diafragm aperture.
The vivo X60 Pro has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features improved battery life than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.