Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.4 |
| -- | 2014-10-28 |
| -- | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| -- | 6.21 ounces |
| -- | Black and Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Droid Turbo is slightly better than Galaxy A35, with a score of 76.4 against 73.9. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Droid Turbo has a newer 4.4.4 version and Galaxy A35 has Android 14 version, so it offers some nice extra features and performance tweaks.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A35, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a higher display density. The Samsung Galaxy A35 has a much bigger memory for applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola Droid Turbo has a really superior hardware performance than Galaxy A35, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processing unit. Motorola Droid Turbo captures better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A35, although it has a way worse 20.7 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 has improved battery lifetime than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.