Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-16 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| -- | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G Stylus has a general score of 79.7, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A35's global score of 73.9. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Moto G Stylus has older 11 version and Galaxy A35 has Android 14 version. The Moto G Stylus features a much faster processor than Galaxy A35, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Moto G Stylus counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A35, although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2300, a quite smaller screen and a just a little inferior amount of pixels per inch of screen. Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A35, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus shoots way better pictures and videos than Galaxy A35. They have the same resolution back facing camera. The Samsung Galaxy A35 features superior battery performance than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 25% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.