Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2017-02-24 |
| -- | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| -- | 6.63 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a general score of 81, which is slightly better than Galaxy A35's overall score of 73.9. Both devices we compare here have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has the newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and Galaxy A35 has Android 14 version. The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A35, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels.
The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a very superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A35. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and 6 GB of RAM. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with just a bit more storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A35, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 256 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A35 has greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a better camera than Galaxy A35, although it has a lot less mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.