Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 15 | Android 4.4.4 |
| -- | 2014-10-28 |
| -- | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| -- | 6.21 ounces |
| -- | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo has an overall score of 77.9, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored)'s 75.6 global score. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola DROID Turbo has newer 4.4.4 version and Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored) has Android 15 version. Motorola DROID Turbo has an incredibly better display than Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored), because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and more pixels per inch of screen.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much better processing power than Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored), because although it has 4 lesser cpu cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional GPU. The Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored) features a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola DROID Turbo's camera is very similar to the camera in Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored), although the Motorola DROID Turbo has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way less mega-pixels camera in the back. The Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Rumored) features greater battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.