Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 437 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A40 is slightly better than Motorola Droid Turbo, with a 79.6 score against 76.4. Galaxy A40 is a a lot newer device, and it's also noticeably lighter and notably thinner than the Motorola Droid Turbo. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A40 has the previous 11 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy A40, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution and a greater pixel quantity in each display inch. The Samsung Galaxy A40 counts with a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 32 GB more internal memory.
Motorola Droid Turbo features just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a graphics co-processor. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A40, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video definition and a much better 20.7 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with better battery life than Galaxy A40, because it has a 3900mAh battery size instead of 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.