Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 437 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A40 has a global score of 79.6, which is a bit better than the vivo X60 Pro's general score of 78.8. Both devices we compare here use the same Android 11 operating system, so both of them should provide the same operating system features. Galaxy A40 is an older and a little bit thicker device than vivo X60 Pro, but Samsung was able to build it incredibly lighter anyway.
The vivo X60 Pro has a superior processing unit than Galaxy A40, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy A40 and vivo X60 Pro both count with extremely similar screens, because although the vivo X60 Pro has a bit worse count of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2376px.
The vivo X60 Pro has a better storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X60 Pro takes greater photographs and videos than Galaxy A40, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for taking images or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot more MP camera in the back, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way better quality videos and pictures and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Vivo X60 Pro has greater battery performance than Galaxy A40, because it has a 4200mAh battery size instead of 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.