Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-15 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A41's overall score of 81.7. Although it's the best we are comparing, we must highlight that it's also an older, just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier device. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but LG V50 ThinQ has the previous 10 version and Galaxy A41 has Android 11 version.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy A41, because it has a bit bigger screen, a bit higher number of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A41, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A41, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more RAM. Galaxy A41 takes much clearer videos and photos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a way tinier aperture and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A41 also counts with a way larger sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality and a much more mega pixels back camera.
The LG V50 ThinQ features just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.