Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A41 is just a bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo, getting an 81.7 score against 76.4. These phones use Android OS, but Galaxy A41 has older 11 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. The Galaxy A41 construction is newer, lighter and noticeably thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo.
Motorola Droid Turbo has a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A41, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. Motorola Droid Turbo features a better looking display than Galaxy A41, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a better display pixels density.
Galaxy A41 counts with a way bigger storage for apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A41 features a better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have a F2 aperture and the same video quality, the Galaxy A41 also has higher 30 frames per second video frame rates and a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has an 11% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.