Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 431 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A41 is slightly better than Motorola Moto G Stylus, with a general score of 81.7 against 79.7. Both devices we compare here use the same Android 11 operating system, so both of them should provide the user the same OS features. Samsung Galaxy A41's construction is somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter than Motorola Moto G Stylus, although both of them were only released with a couple of months difference.
Galaxy A41 features a bit better screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher display density and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Moto G Stylus features a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A41, and although they both have a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Moto G Stylus also has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola Moto G Stylus and Samsung Galaxy A41 count with extremely similar processors, both of them have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. The Motorola Moto G Stylus shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same back-facing camera sensor size, a back facing camera with a 48 mega-pixels resolution and the same video definition, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light environments.
The Moto G Stylus counts with a little better battery performance than Galaxy A41, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.