Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A41 is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a score of 81.7 against 77.8. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A41 has the previous 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy A41's design is extremely lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it is notably thicker and was released 4 years before.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better looking display than Galaxy A41, because although it has a bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a really bigger display and a way better resolution of 2200 x 2480. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A41, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage.
Galaxy A41 counts with a much more powerful processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a really longer battery life than Galaxy A41, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a better camera than Galaxy A41, because it has a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality photos, a larger aperture for better photography and video in low light situations, a back facing camera with a higher 50 megapixels resolution and a way better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.