Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2016-01-08 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.70 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black and Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo has an overall score of 77.9, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A5 (2016)'s global score of 71.9. Even being the best in this comparison review, the Motorola DROID Turbo is an older, somewhat heavier and extremely thicker device than Galaxy A5 (2016). Motorola DROID Turbo has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has less CPU cores (although they are faster), it also counts with more RAM memory and an additional graphics processing unit.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), and although they both have a same size screen, the Motorola DROID Turbo also has a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch of display. Motorola DROID Turbo shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs in low light situations, it also counts with a lot higher 20.7 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a better memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage. The Motorola DROID Turbo features improved battery performance than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a 34% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.