Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-01-08 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.70 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G Stylus is better than Galaxy A5 (2016), getting a global score of 79.7 against 71.9. The Motorola Moto G Stylus is a extremely newer cellphone than Galaxy A5 (2016), but it is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. Galaxy A5 (2016) has a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a little bit better display density.
Moto G Stylus features a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has 112 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with just a little better processing power than Galaxy A5 (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Moto G Stylus features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a back camera with much more megapixels, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos. The Moto G Stylus features a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.