Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-01-08 | 2019-06-06 |
| 5.70 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z4 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), getting a score of 79.8 against 71.9. The Motorola Moto Z4 design has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), but it's just a little bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016) has a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater screen density.
Moto Z4 features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A5 (2016), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Moto Z4 also has more RAM memory. The Moto Z4 has a very superior camera than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a much more megapixels back facing camera, a bigger aperture and a much better (4K) video quality.
The Motorola Moto Z4 has a superior memory to install games and applications than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory. Motorola Moto Z4 counts with greater battery duration than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a 24% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.