Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2016-01-08 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.70 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 424 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is better than the Galaxy A5 (2016), getting an 84.7 score against 71.9. Samsung Galaxy A32 is a much newer cellphone than Galaxy A5 (2016), but it is noticeably heavier and thicker. The Galaxy A32 features a bit faster processor than Galaxy A5 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A32 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy A5 (2016) features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1080 x 1920px resolution and a way greater pixels density. The Galaxy A32 captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a way better (4K) video resolution, a back facing camera with a lot better resolution and a larger aperture to take better captures and videos in low light situations.
Galaxy A32 features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB and 64 GB internal storage. Galaxy A32 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.