Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-01-08 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.70 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a global score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016)'s score of 71.9. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a way newer and incredibly thinner cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), but it's incredibly heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016) features a much better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 14 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a much larger screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a greater camera than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos in low-light situations, a much higher resolution camera in the back and a way better video resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a 5700mAh battery size against 2900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.