Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Black and Blue |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a score of 77.9, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A5 (2017)'s general score of 75.8. Although it's the best device in this review, Motorola DROID Turbo is an a lot older, way thicker and just a little bit heavier device than the Galaxy A5 (2017). Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a better screen than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a display of the same size, the Motorola DROID Turbo also has a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater pixels number per display inch.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has 4 lesser cores (but faster), and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a graphics processor. Motorola DROID Turbo captures a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera and a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) features a better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 256 GB. The Motorola DROID Turbo has longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.