Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2024-08-08 |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 has a global score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)'s 75.8 global score. The Motorola Edge 50 is a somewhat heavier cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), but both have the same thickness. The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) has a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 5 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a sharper screen than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a better 1220 x 2712 resolution, a larger display and a little greater pixels quantity in each screen inch. The Motorola Edge 50 has a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Motorola Edge 50 captures way better photos and videos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a larger aperture, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lot more mega-pixels camera. The Motorola Edge 50 features a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.