Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Mystic indigo |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus is a little bit better than the Galaxy A5 (2017), having a general score of 79.7 against 75.8. The Moto G Stylus is a incredibly newer phone than the Galaxy A5 (2017), but it is somewhat heavier and thicker. The Moto G Stylus features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G Stylus also has 1 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A5 (2017) has a slightly better display than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of display. The Motorola Moto G Stylus has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a back camera with lot more megapixels, a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger aperture for better low light images and videos.
The Moto G Stylus features a much bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 96 GB more internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. Moto G Stylus counts with longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.