Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-01-13 | -- |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G60s is slightly better than Galaxy A5 (2017), having a 79.9 score against 75.8. Despite being the best in our current comparison, Moto G60s is a heavier and thicker phone than Galaxy A5 (2017). The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto G60s, because although it has a lot smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a little better count of pixels per display inch.
Moto G60s features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G60s also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Motorola Moto G60s features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Moto G60s captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light environments and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Moto G60s has a much better battery performance than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 67 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.