Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-01-13 | 2019-06-06 |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Gray and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z4 has an overall score of 79.8, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A5 (2017)'s score of 75.8. Motorola Moto Z4's body is a lot newer and a little bit thinner than Galaxy A5 (2017)'s, but it's also a little bit heavier. Moto Z4 features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Moto Z4 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A5 (2017) has a little more vivid screen than Moto Z4, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater number of pixels per screen inch. The Moto Z4 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a larger diafragm aperture, a much higher 3840x2160 video definition and a camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution.
Moto Z4 counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB and 96 GB more internal memory capacity. Moto Z4 has superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 3600mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.