Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a bit better than Galaxy A5 (2017), getting a general score of 77.8 against 75.8. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a extremely newer and noticeably thinner device than the Galaxy A5 (2017), although it is also much heavier. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a just a bit inferior pixels count per inch of display, it also counts with a lot higher 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution and a much bigger display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 480 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy A5 (2017) counts with a much better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a bigger aperture, a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a way more MP back-facing camera. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better battery life than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.