Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro is a little bit better than the Galaxy A5 (2017), having a 78.8 score against 75.8. Vivo X60 Pro's design is a lot newer and just a little bit thinner than Galaxy A5 (2017)'s, although it is heavier. The vivo X60 Pro has a greater processing power than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has 9 GB more RAM.
The vivo X60 Pro features just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a just a little inferior pixels amount per inch of display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2376px and a bigger display. The vivo X60 Pro takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a lot more megapixels back-facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos and video and a lot higher video definition.
Vivo X60 Pro features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage. Vivo X60 Pro has a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.