Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy A5
SM-A500, SM-A500F, SM-A500K, SM-A500H, SM-A500L, SM-A500HQ| Global Score | |
| 72.4 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-10-30 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.48 x 2.74 x 0.26 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.34 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Gray, Pink and White | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminium | Glass |
| $ 239.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 294 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (533 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G200 5G is much better than Galaxy A5, having a general score of 86.2 against 72.4. Both devices in this review use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Moto G200 5G has older 11 version while Galaxy A5 has Android 4.4.4. The Motorola Moto G200 5G design is much newer than Galaxy A5's, but it is extremely thicker and notably heavier.
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a little better processing power than Galaxy A5, because although it has a 32 bits processing unit instead of 64-bits and doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with more CPU cores and 6 GB more RAM. Galaxy A5 has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G200 5G, although it has a lot lower pixel number per screen inch, a way worse 1280 x 720 resolution and a really smaller display.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A5, because it has a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution. Motorola Moto G200 5G has much more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A5, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a very superior battery life than Galaxy A5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.