Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy A5
SM-A500, SM-A500F, SM-A500K, SM-A500H, SM-A500L, SM-A500HQ| Global Score | |
| 72.4 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-30 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.48 x 2.74 x 0.26 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.34 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Gray, Pink and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 239.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (533 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.24 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is a lot better than the Galaxy A5, with a score of 87 against 72.4. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola razr (2020) has the older 11 version while Galaxy A5 has Android 4.4.4. Even though Motorola razr (2020) is newer than the Galaxy A5, it's somewhat thicker and much heavier.
Motorola razr (2020) features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A5, because although it has a 32-bit processor instead of 64-bits and doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores. The Galaxy A5 features a bit better display than Motorola razr (2020), although it has a way worse resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels, a little smaller display and a bit worse screen pixel density.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A5, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 240 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola razr (2020) shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5, because it has a way more megapixels back facing camera and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Motorola razr (2020) features longer battery performance than Galaxy A5, because it has 2800mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A5, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy A5. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A5, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.