Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy A5
SM-A500, SM-A500F, SM-A500K, SM-A500H, SM-A500L, SM-A500HQ| Global Score | |
| 72.4 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 15 |
| 2014-10-30 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.48 x 2.74 x 0.26 inches | -- |
| 4.34 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Gray, Pink and White | -- |
| Aluminium | -- |
| $ 239.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 294 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (533 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.24 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a little bit better than the Galaxy A5, getting a general score of 79.2 against 72.4. Even though Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is incredibly heavier than the Galaxy A5, it's notably thinner and also noticeably newer. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS, but the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has the previous 15 version and Galaxy A5 has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Galaxy A5 counts with an incredibly better screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lot smaller screen. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a superior memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A5, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A5 counts with a lot better performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has less cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU and an additional GPU. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A5, because it has a 4700mAh battery size instead of 2300mAh.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) shoots way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5, because it has a lot better video definition and a back camera with a much better 50 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.