Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-03-15 | 2022-03-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone SE (2022) has a general score of 86.6, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A50's 83.8 score. The iPhone SE (2022) construction is newer, somewhat lighter and a bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A50. IPhone SE (2022) counts with a quite better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone SE (2022) also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The iPhone SE (2022) counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A50, although it has a much smaller screen, a lot lower 750 x 1334 resolution and a little less pixels per display inch. The Galaxy A50 has much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A50 shoots a little bit better videos and photos than iPhone SE (2022), because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a larger aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited environments and a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a really longer battery life than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2018mAh.
Although iPhone SE (2022) is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A50. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy A50, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.