Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-03-15 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is a bit better than the Google Nexus 6P's 80.3 global score. Samsung Galaxy A50's construction is extremely newer and just a bit lighter, but a little thicker than the Google Nexus 6P. The Google Nexus 6P features a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy A50 has a much better storage for games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A50 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A50 has a little better performance than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A50 also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 16% bigger battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a little bit better camera than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better images and videos in low-light situations and a lot higher 25 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy A50 is also a bargain compared to others, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.