Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2019-03-15 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is a bit better than the LG V20, getting a global score of 83.8 against 77. The Galaxy A50 is a just a bit lighter device than LG V20, but they have the same thickness. Galaxy A50 features a bit better processor than LG V20, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Galaxy A50 also has a greater number of cores (and also faster).
LG V20 counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. LG V20 has a little bit better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 shoots slightly better pictures and videos than LG V20, and although they both have a same size sensor, the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a back facing camera with a much higher 25 mega pixels resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light situations.
Samsung Galaxy A50 features greater battery duration than LG V20, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Galaxy A50 is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V20. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy A50, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG V20, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.